I read Liz Moore’s The God of the Woods recently.
This won’t be a complete review, but will try to offer enough of an appraisal to know if you, dear reader, would like to devote your time to this fairly long book.
My main thought is that I wish it had been better. The work starts off so well and had so much potential, which is why I kept reading it. The characters are interesting, the beginning is a banger, and the mystery is compelling. But it begins to suffer as it spends more and more time with viewpoint characters who offer little to the story. Too much of the action happens off the page — it’s like Moore has no idea what to do with anything more than people talking, so God of the Woods has no substantive propulsive action scenes at all even when they are core components of her own story. Nearly everything important occurs outside of the reader’s observation. While this can work — see No Country For Old Men for an example — you have to be Cormac McCarthy or the Coen Brothers to pull something like that off.
And Moore is neither of those things.
As the book becomes increasingly meandering and the characters do little to advance the story, I began to hope the ending would be the banger that the first 30-40 pages were. No such luck. The denouement is unbelievable, unsatisfying and borderline insulting to the reader.
There was a good novel in there somewhere. A decent editor probably could’ve located it for Moore, who clearly has some writing talent. But like many of the characters in the story, that editor was nowhere to be found.
I don’t have a Goodreads account, but if I did I’d rate The God of the Woods 2 out of 5 stars. However, I’d rate the first 100 pages a 4.5/5 and the last 100 a 1/5. By the by, Yun’s review is better than mine and more thorough — and is essentially what I think, but she is more charitable to the book than I am.